Check out Michael Berkens post to see why.
Incoming search terms:
- camroullete
- camroullete com
- camrollete
- www camroullete
Absurd Comments
Kate on Forgetting to hit the delete button
Didn't they strike a deal with Verisign to mitigate that mistake ?Whiter on Elephant Traffic breaks even!
Will be possible monetize traffic from cctld's in the future? I have 200k uip/month (i have only cz, sk domains).kkk on Elephant Traffic breaks even!
I just don't get it. On the front page is moving banner, it looks like domainanme.com Price xxx Volume yyyy Does it mean, ...Squattar on The curse of domaining aka domainer disease
Kevin Ham = squatter Sahar Sadrid = squatter in order to make it in business you need a good idea and a ...Michal on Moniker puts together best auction inventory EVER
Have to agree. Lists looks really great. Look forward to final prices of these domains :)
#1 by Roman Novacek on June 1, 2010 - 01:05
Quote
Well, the contract was legally binding – this fact is hardly to be challenged. I am not sure whether that guy can be sued for $150k damages but he is in a breach of contract of course.
I think we should keep in mind legal certainty of buyer B. The first contract was performed and the second one should be found void.
Anyway thanks for sharing this story…
#2 by stage hire on June 3, 2010 - 18:58
Quote
you need to correct that typo in the headline lol
‘roulette’