Posts Tagged channel

Fighting upstream feed provider exclusivity

Just wanted to bring up an issue that is not often discussed because the current situation is simply taken as for granted – that parking companies are always hostages of one upstream ppc feed provider – that being either Google or Yahoo, which they have to deal with exclusively. Since they know that the relationship is key to their existence, they are very limited in other ways how they can monetize their partners’ domains (the only exception is banned domains for which they can bring in second tier feed providers etc). This prevents innovations in domain monetization.

This arrangement is severealy hurting domain owners and my belief is that certain anti-monopoly style authorities should look into these arrangements. For example I believe that if parking companies would be able to mix both Google and Yahoo together (even on one results page), there would be roughly a 20% uplift of earnings for domain owners. It would also force G/Y to pay out more because they would be competing head-to-head for every click. However both G & Y force exclusivity onto the domain channel with every parking company. There are companies that have both feeds – such as Infospace – but those cannot be used on the domain channel. If Infospace can have both, why not the parking companies?

Incoming search terms:

  • fandor kill yourself
  • feed domain providers
  • feed provider
  • infospace ppc feed

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Can PPC fall further?

The last 2-3 years have been tragic for the parking side of the domain business.  Parking earnings have probably gone down by an average of 60%. Can they fall further?

We should probably look at the main factors behind the fall in ppc on the domain channel in the first place to able to make a good judgement:

  • GOOG/YHOO cleaning up the domain channel’s traffic quality alongside with the parking companies. Within the domain community there has always been this belief that domain traffic quality is absolutely outstanding in comparison to search, which is usually based on one stupid report from Efficient Frontier. As a whole, domain generated traffic is worse than search for sure, there are just certain domains/verticals where traffic quality is indeed better, but this cannot be generalized for the whole channel. GOOG/YHOO have worked hard on establishing what domain traffic converts and which doesn’t and have established mechanisms to penalize bad traffic.
  • Along with this clean up payouts have been cut using some kind of quality control mechanism. Although being a black box, it is likely that bad traffic is penalized in financial terms but also good traffic is not rewarded, or at least not rewarded enough.
  • Advertisers are now easily able to exclude the domain channel from their PPC advertising campaigns. That is also a pretty recent case.
  • GOOG/YHOO simply taking a bigger cut. One thing is what the parking companies rev share is in their contracts, second being the real rev share that takes into account the “black box”.
  • Advertisers are more capable of measuring the success of their ppc campaigns. More and more advertisers measure conversions etc. This again is connected to traffic quality I mentioned above.
  • The general economy. Not really necessary to explain.

The good news is that parking earnings have stabilized in the recent months, or at least they are not in free fall anymore.

So I think there is light at the end of the tunnel because a new “equilibrium” is being reached with the major cleanup of traffic quality and PPC should even increase as the economy improves. With the massive previous fall of PPC, other ways of monetizing domain traffic are suddenly kicking in. For example, I am now selling over 5% of my traffic directly to advertisers and I just started sales in January. I haven’t even started to fiddle around with affiliate stuff yet, which should bring another slight boost.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,