Posts Tagged Google

Will Google DARE to kill the redirect?

And why it should be in every domainer’s interest to prevent Google doing this…

Few weeks ago Sedo started circulating an email to its publishers recommending them to switch their domains to DNS parking saying that its upstream feed provider (i.e Google) may soon stop accepting traffic via redirects. This would obviously make traffic splitting/optimalization services such as Above or ParkLogic obsolete since they rely on the ability to split traffic. I see Above for example as the most revolutionary thing to come up in domain monetization in the last two years. Because it makes it possible to simply and automatically send traffic to the parking company that pays best and takes all the hassle with testing away.

So why does Google hate/fear the redirect so much? Well, Google has often said that redirect traffic is more often fraudulent than traffic where the domain’s DNS sits on the DNS of a parking company, which is in itself very questionable. I believe that the main reason though is that services such as Above take away part of the control Google has of the domain channel ands screws up it’s TQ/shaving algorithms. Also it would make life for new alternative monetization solutions much more difficult – since they rely on Google/Yahoo as a potential backfill for traffic they cannot sell for a higher price. Google is aware that its two main strengths against its competition are a) its superior monetization of the long tail and b) its international coverage. Any new monetization service cannot match it in this, but it can compete in various traffic niches. Hence I believe Google wants to raise the barriers to entry – this is obviously another example of potential antimonopolistic behaviour.

What is also potentially funny about this is that, as the owners of Above have told me, Google parking companies have actually won more traffic at the expense of Yahoo one’s – in essence due to the very existence of redirect parking. Secondly, do you think it is a coincidence that Sedo was the first company to actually send its publishers this email and why haven’t other G-based companies done the same? My belief is that Sedo has lost a lot of marketshare due to Above to its arch competitor Namedrive, which has outmonetized Sedo often in its core international markets. So in a way it is in Sedo’s interest to lobby Google to ban the redirect. Because if more domainers migrate to Above that is potentially more lost marketshare.

My hope is that Google will not implement this change. It should be your hope as well as a domainer.

Incoming search terms:

  • will google last

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fighting upstream feed provider exclusivity

Just wanted to bring up an issue that is not often discussed because the current situation is simply taken as for granted – that parking companies are always hostages of one upstream ppc feed provider – that being either Google or Yahoo, which they have to deal with exclusively. Since they know that the relationship is key to their existence, they are very limited in other ways how they can monetize their partners’ domains (the only exception is banned domains for which they can bring in second tier feed providers etc). This prevents innovations in domain monetization.

This arrangement is severealy hurting domain owners and my belief is that certain anti-monopoly style authorities should look into these arrangements. For example I believe that if parking companies would be able to mix both Google and Yahoo together (even on one results page), there would be roughly a 20% uplift of earnings for domain owners. It would also force G/Y to pay out more because they would be competing head-to-head for every click. However both G & Y force exclusivity onto the domain channel with every parking company. There are companies that have both feeds – such as Infospace – but those cannot be used on the domain channel. If Infospace can have both, why not the parking companies?

Incoming search terms:

  • fandor kill yourself
  • feed domain providers
  • feed provider
  • infospace ppc feed

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

The big push into CPA

What I’ve been working on in the last month or so is building out a standalone CPA department in our company that will focus on monetizing my and my friend’s type-in traffic. The CPA department will be symbiotic with our Elephant Traffic offering because it will be buying traffic for monetization through ET, hence we should be capable of covering more and more verticals soon. We will obviously not be limited only to domain traffic but will also experiment with PPC, display, email etc, mainly acquiring US traffic for our CPA offerings.

The department will be headed by my long time friend Arnost Machytka, who spent the last two years working at Threadneedle, a big fund management firm based in London. Working alongside Arnost will be Martin Glatz, who has worked at Aegis Media recently. You should be seeing us at events such as LeadsCon and Affiliate Summit more often now.

The whole purpose off all these alternative monetization initiatives of mine is simple – by years end I have a goal of generating 20% of my domain income from alternative monetization. Last week Google clawed back $22k from one of my parking accounts for no obvious reason – a stark reminder that I cannot rely on them for monetization.

Incoming search terms:

  • facing the absurd

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

So how big is this pie we are all after?

Ever since I started in domaining, I’ve been trying to gauge the size of the market. I think over the years I’ve gotten better at it, so here is my take (I appreciate any feedback in the commentary section if you have more accurate data).

Let’s say the first part of the domaining market is concerned with the monetization of type-in traffic. The majority of this is handled via parking companies running through google and yahoo feeds. Let’s start with the google companies and how much revenue they pull in (a large part of this is then passed over to domainers). The biggest is clearly DomainSponsor, which in my guess pulls in $12 million in revenue a month. Second is Sedo with about $5 million. Namedrive is around $3 million. Fabulous in my view is around $1 million. Then you have the other vanity/private feeds that could add up to another $2 million. That’s about $23 million for the google co’s. Judging the size of the yahoo companies individually is more difficult for me, but my assumption is that they all add up to about 40% of the google co’s, so let’s say that’s another $10 million.  So we have about $33 million flowing into the parking companies every month. Then you have the alternative monetization, which covers everything from affiliate, lead-generation, minisites, zero-click (such as our Elephant Traffic). That is much more difficult to gauge but it could probably be another $5 million a month. So we’re at $38 million/month that is tied strictly to the monetization of type-in traffic of domains. With hopefully monetization slightly improving this year, we can probably peg the size of this market to about $500 million for 2010.

The second main part of the domaining market is concerned with buying and selling domains. This is an area I am much less focused on so I would appreciate the help and reader’s opinions. What we can probably agree on is that Sedo is probably the market leader in this, doing about $100 million a year in sales. Name Media should be around $25 million. Moniker and Rick Latona probably do about $10 million each through their auctions/brokerage/newsletters. Then you have the drop-catching marketplaces (namejet, snapnames, TDNAM, pool), where I am not exactly sure, but my guess is about $30 million a year in total from them (?). Then you have the reported private sales or sales through various non-domaining venues, which probably come to $10 million. And then there is a massive market for portfolios, which are generally traded privately (sometimes through big brokers like Moniker and Namedrive, I am not counting them in their respetive numbers), which probably totals another $30 million a year. Then you have the more minor venues such as NDX Market, Flippa.com, Bido, domain blogs, forums etc, which probably account for another $10 million. If I add up all these visible/semi-visible sales that I mentioned here, we are at about $225 million/year. But then there is a huge market of private deals we never get to here about, not just in .com but across all the various other cctlds. That isn’t almost impossible to gauge, but it is definitely about $50 million/year, it could even be $100-150 million quite easily.

Then you have the other components of the domain business, which I do not really want to include, such as the registrar business, development etc. But those are really not domaining. But if we could include parts of them that are directly tied to domaining, it’s obvious that together with the monetization of type-in traffic and domain sales it adds up to a $1 billion business annually. It’s fun to be part of a billion dollar business, isn’t it?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Sedo’s parent, AdLINK Group unveils 2009 financial results

I read a brief post on DNW.com about Sedo’s annual results, so I wanted to look at the whole annual report in more detail, it can be found here. AdLINK is really composed of two divisions, the first being affili.net and the second being Sedo.

Unfortunately there isn’t too much information regarding Sedo itself, such as it’s gross margin and costs (only group costs can be found), so it’s really difficult to judge how well Sedo is really doing. The only interesting number is Sedo’s revenue for 2009, which came in at 46.6 milion EUR. That was a fall of 14.8% in comparison to 2008, when revenue came in at 54.7 million EUR.

The big question is what this revenue is really composed of. My assumption is that Sedo books only its 10% sales commission as revenue but books its entire parking revenue as revenue. I.e what it gets from google is counted as revenue and what it pays out to parking partners (domainers) is cost of goods sold.

If this would be the case, brokerage commissions amount to probably 7 million EUR of the total revenue (Sedo says it sells $8 million worth of domains a month) and the remainder, about 40 million EUR revenue would come from parking. That’s about $52 million a year, or less than $5 million a month.

That’s pretty small and it seems that in fact Oversee is an even bigger leader in domain monetization than I thought, probably being more than double the size of Sedo in terms of monetization revenue. Conversely, Namedrive looks like it’s coming much closer to Sedo than I previously thought.

I don’t want to pronounce Sedo as the laggard of the domain industry yet, but it seems like a former champion of the industry is losing out in the battlefield, at least in the short term.

Incoming search terms:

  • sedo annual revenues
  • sedo revenue

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Is a great domain really a prerequisite of building a successful business online?

I am always fascinated how a lot of domainer’s perspective is really narrow. If you ask them if they had $100k to start an online business, in most cases they will tell you that they would start by buying a great domain and say, spend $90k on it. Then use the remaining $10k to build a site by a freelancer and maybe spend some money on Google advertising to get it running. Then you get websites like property.com as a result of this approach.

On the contrary I would spend a maximum of 20% on a domain, more probably even 10%. I would plough the rest into developing a great user experince, great content and at least 50% into various forms of online marketing. When we’ve been developing sites, this approach just brings a better ROI for us.

It’s sad to say, but I don’t think an absolutely great domain is a prerequisite to success online. In some cases I can actually even see it as being detrimental. Because you quickly get the mindset that you have the best domain in the niche and your competitor’s don’t, hence you supposedly have an edge. But that’s the reason why your competitors work even harder to get ahead of you. It’s a little bit like dutch disease, in which natural resources become more of a curse than an advantage. It’s just that here your curse may be a great domain.

And now hate me!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Guns don’t kill people, rappers do!

Congratulations to Moniker and associated parties on the sale of guns.com for $800k. I was interested in the domain as well submitting a $700k offer. Monte did a great job trying to do a deal and I can confess I almost got irritated by him sending me emails everyday if I am willing to go higher :) (I’m good friends with Monte, so just a joke). This is just proof how Moniker works hard to do these deals for their clients.

Why this domain really caught my attentions was a) because of the stable type-in traffic (1,000 uniques/day for years) and paradoxically b) the fact google doesn’t allow firearms ads. That’s why the true earning potential of the domain was depressed and I had a belief I could probably double to tripple the current monetization level going direct to advertisers via our zero-click model because this source of traffic is one of the few available for them to advertise on the internet.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The commoditization of parking, the margin squeeze and few other thoughts on parking

The domain business is still about parking. That is still where the money is made and if you haven’t realized this yet, then you are getting something wrong. In many ways a large part of the aftermarket is held up by the parking business as parking earnings are reinvested etc.

In many ways, parking hasn’t really evolved over the last 5 years too much. It’s still quite similar. Parking companies are an entity that acquire an ad feed and are a mediator between domainers and the upstream ad providers such as Google and Yahoo. They ad a little twist with optimization etc but that’s it. Nothing fundamentally has changed over the last 5 years.

What is starting to happen and will continue is a margin squeeze for parking companies, it’s not really an envious spot to be in to be honest. A significant catalyst to that are services like Above.com (great service btw, really recommend it). Plain and simple, they send your traffic to wherever it pays best in an automated fashion. Hence parking is really becoming just a commodity because domainers are going to send their traffic simply where their traffic pays best. This should force parking companies to inovate more but also will force them to cut their margins. At least some good news to domainers!

This is really happening now and will grow even more so in the future (that is if evil Google doesn’t force the ban of redirects). DomainSponsor is now receiving more than 10% of it’s publisher traffic via Above. For namedrive I estimate it’s likely to be more like 20%. That’s a lot of revenue.

Parking companies should quickly realize that they have to start inovating more to be able to get more traffic from domainers. They should look into alternative forms of monetization like zero-click, lead generation, CPA. Or their margins will be squeezed further and eventually the middlemen could be cut out entirely.

As parking is more commoditized it looks obvious that the parking companies that built up/acquired their own portfolios have a decent hedge against this. Owning the traffic is vital. From this point of view the smart parking companies have been Oversee, HitFarm, Parked, NameMedia – they all have very sizeable portfolios of their own. Sedo has something as well of it’s own, not huge though. But for example Namedrive and Trafficz (not completely sure about Skenzo) have very limited portfolios and hence the margin squeeze could effect them much more than the others.

The second thing that will be vital in the future is owning the advertiser relationships if you don’t want to be squeezed. Parking companies should start going more direct to advertisers, it is a necessity for the future. Because in the end we are pretty much reliant on Google. Google can squeeze all of us.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,